[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C87907A.2040500@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:32:42 +0800
From: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] lib: introduce some memory copy macros and
functions
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:05:19 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:57:07 +0800
> Miao Xie<miaox@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:19:25 +0200 (cest), Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>
>>>> According to the data, the length of the most copies is>=128.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the data. Large is easier to optimize than small, that's
>>> good.
>>>
>>> Could you also measure how many memsets need the backwards copy?
^^^^^^^ :-)
>>> (should be easy to add)
>>
>> I think memset doesn't need the backwards copy.
>
> I meant for memmove of course. Obviously memset doesn't need a backwards
> copy. That was just the only thing the script didn't measure because
> the original version didn't have memmove support.
memmove
total 5224252
[snip]
forward copy
value |-------------------------------------------------- count
0 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 980253
backward copy
value |-------------------------------------------------- count
0 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 4243999
the backward copy is much more than the forward copy.
Thanks
Miao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists