[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285464746.6115.108.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:32:26 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, T Dent <tdent48227@...il.com>,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, dmonakhov@...nvz.org,
sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 21:04 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> But the stupid thing is
> trying to do it on a file-by-file basis in the first place, when for
> something like fs/ext4, it really should be done on a subdirectory
> basis.
That's not true at all.
If there's a listed maintainer linked to a pattern
like "F: fs/ext4/", then all files in that
directory and any subdirectories are "maintained".
If a maintainer wants to "exclude" particular files,
or subdirectories, that's possible with the "X:" tag.
> What really annoys me is newbies who use checkpatch.pl in its --file
> mode, and then assume that every single warning is a deadly bug that
> much be patched.
Perhaps checkpatch.pl should print some "don't submit
patches for stupid stuff" when used with -f.
> I at least never use it.
Nor are you required to.
Tool use is optional. I don't care if you carve
patches with a mallet onto stone tablets and send
them by swarms of carrier pigeon to Linus so can
reuse the stone to build an actual castle.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists