linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CA0A1A6.2050707@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:52:38 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Tracey Dent <tdent48227@...il.com>,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, dmonakhov@...nvz.org,
	sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue

Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:31:52PM -0400, Tracey Dent wrote:
>> From: Tracey Dent <Tdent48227@...il.com>
>>
>> Found and corrected indent issue using checkpatch.pl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tracey Dent <tdent48227@...il.com>
> 
> Patches that fix whitespace issues aren't really worthwhile.  They
> tend to cause extra work for the me as the maintainer, since it means
> that patches that others send me end up failing due to whitespace
> issues, which then have to be manually fixed up.
> 

I second that sentiment, despite being guilty of similar patches
to other subsystems in the distant past ;)  I've seen the light.

I would prefer that these not get merged.

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html