lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB0D214.1070301@cybericom.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:35:32 +0100
From:	Chris Lee <cslee-list@...ericom.co.uk>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Shorten the backup process?

Hi All,
I hope this to bee food for thought as I am not able to code such a thing nor am 
I in need of such a thing but it seemed like a good idea when it struck me, so;
When an filesystem is snap shotted it is a function of the  running filesystem 
to provide the data in that snapshot. (or is that lvms doing?)
Most users who use snapshots for backup are going to mount the snap shot and 
then tar it up.
Would it be a good idea to provide a virtual file through something like the 
sysfs that is a tar representation of the snapshot so that a backup can just 
copy the tar file off as needed?

Thanks for reading,

Regards,
Chris.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ