[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101020122552.GB3335@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:25:52 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...il.com>, jaxboe@...ionio.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] writeback: sync quota after inodes writeback
On Fri 08-10-10 13:08:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 07:00:26PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > inode writeback usually result in quota changes especially
> > on filesystems with delalloc. So quota_sync() before writeback
> > seems pointless. Let's do the job in a natural way.
>
> Yes, that's one reason why we can't use the quota sync callback for XFS,
> as we need to do it after the actual sync. Then again I'm not even
> sure we need to bother with a callout from the writeback code.
> Following the model of all other quota code filesystems using quota
> should probably just call it from their ->sync_fs method. Note that
> this allows allows other optimizations for using the generic quota
> code. dquot_quota_sync currently calls ->sync_fs by itself which
> could be optimized away by that design.
Yes, that would make sense but then we have to change quotactl(Q_SYNC,
...) to result in calling ->sync_fs() as it does now. Because we have
to get quota data to disk in response to this call.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists