lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:46:15 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong?  submit_bio() suddenly stops working...

On 2010-10-21 18:55, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:59:46AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> I don't see anything immediately wrong with your approach. I suspect
>> we'll need to see sysrq-t traces of the relevant processes to make a
>> more educated guess!
> 
> I've uploaded a trace output that includes the sysrq-t trace, but I
> don't think it shows anything interesting.  We're not hanging on any
> kind of loack as near as I can tell.  It looks like
> __generic_make_request() is calling q->make_request_fn(), and this is
> returning without actually doing anything.
> 
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~tytso/ext4-bio-patches/kvm-console-2
> 
> In this trace, I added a patch to prove that __generic_make_request()
> is calling __make_request (I wasn't sure what q->make_request_fn was
> indirecting to, so I added a brute force lookup to make sure I
> understood what was going on), but at one point, it just starts
> queuing the request, and it enters cfq, but the request never gets
> dispatched out.  Maybe this is a failure of the plugging/unplugging
> mechanisms?
> 
> I guess I can start putting in more brute-force printk's inside
> __make_request and inside the cfq scheduler to try to understand what
> is going on, but I'm really guessing at this point.
> 
> If you have any suggestions about more elegant ways of figuring what
> is happening, please do let me know....

I will take a look at the traces.

By the sound of things, if I were you I'd turn on the mem and slab
debugging to catch use-before-init and use-after-free. Mysterious hangs
in the IO sub system are usually caused by such bugs. And the regular
debugging aids, just to see if that produces anything of interest.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ