[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101022172536.GP3127@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:25:36 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Bernd Schubert <bs_lists@...ef.fastmail.fm>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>
Subject: Re: ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from
previous mount: IO failure
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:33:29PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> is is really a good idea to allow the filesystem to mount if something like
> that comes up? I really would prefer if mount would abort.
>
> Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814294] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from p
> revious mount: IO failure
> Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814314] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem
> check.
>
> (please ignore "ldiskfs", it was just renamed to that by Lustre, but is
> ext4 based as in RHEL5.5, so 2.6.32-ish).
Did you try running e2fsck first? If it detects the error after
running the journal, it will run the file system check right then and
there. If it doesn't, it's a bug. If you're not running e2fsck
first, and the filesystem had previously detected inconsistencies, the
long-standing tradition is to allow that, since root should know what
it's doing.
And there are times when you do want to mount a filesystem with known
errors; for example, in the case of the root file system, we have
always allowed a read-only mount to continue, so that we can run
e2fsck without requiring a rescue CD 99% of the time.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists