lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101022183219.GQ3127@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:32:19 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Bernd Schubert <bs_lists@...ef.fastmail.fm>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>
Subject: Re: ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from
 previous mount: IO failure

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 07:42:49PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> No, it is far more difficult than that. The devices are managed by
> pacemaker.  Which means: I/O errors come up -> Lustre complains
> about that in its proc file. Pacemaker monitoring fails, so
> pacemaker stops the device and starts it again.

I'm not sure what errors you're referring to, but if the errors are
related to file system inconsistencies, by definition umounting and
re-mounting isn't going to fix things, and could result in more
damage.  For certain errors, you really do need to run e2fsck before
remounting the device.

Can you not change pacemaker to stop the device, run e2fsck, and then
remount the file system?

It seems like the safer the thing to do.

					- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ