[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101115214831.GA18195@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:48:31 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Mingming Cao <mcao@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: ext4_fill_super shouldn't return 0 on corruption
At the start of ext4_fill_super, ret is set to -EINVAL, and any failure path
out of that function returns this ret. However, the generic_check_addressable
clause sets ret = 0 if it passes, which means that a subsequent failure (e.g.
a group checksum error) returns 0 even though the mount should fail. This
causes vfs_kern_mount in turn to think that the mount succeeded (because
PTR_ERR(0) is false), leading to an oops.
A simple fix is to avoid using ret for the generic_check_addressable check,
which was last changed in commit 30ca22c70e3ef0a96ff84de69cd7e8561b416cb2.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...ibm.com>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 40131b7..a44bc59 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3257,9 +3257,8 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
* Test whether we have more sectors than will fit in sector_t,
* and whether the max offset is addressable by the page cache.
*/
- ret = generic_check_addressable(sb->s_blocksize_bits,
- ext4_blocks_count(es));
- if (ret) {
+ if (generic_check_addressable(sb->s_blocksize_bits,
+ ext4_blocks_count(es))) {
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "filesystem"
" too large to mount safely on this system");
if (sizeof(sector_t) < 8)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists