[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101116125016.GA31957@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:50:16 -0500
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, david@...morbit.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, cmm@...ibm.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Ext4: fail if we try to use hole punch
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:25:35PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 07:05 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Ext4 doesn't have the ability to punch holes yet, so make sure we return
>> EOPNOTSUPP if we try to use hole punching through fallocate. This support can
>> be added later. Thanks,
>>
>
> Instead of teaching filesystems to fail if they don't support the
> capability, why don't supporting filesystems say so, allowing the fail
> code to be in common code?
>
There is no simple way to test if a filesystem supports hole punching or not so
the check has to be done per fs. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists