linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:29:18 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, tytso@....edu,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
	sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate
 super_operation

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:19:58AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I guess I was assuming that, on receiving a FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, a
> filesystem that was TRIM-aware would pass that information down to the
> block device that it's mounted on.  I strongly feel that we shouldn't
> have two interfaces to do essentially the same thing.
> 
> I guess I'm saying that you're going to have to learn about TRIM :-)

Did you actually look Lukas FITRIM code (not the slight reordering here,
but the original one).  It's the ext4 version of the batched discard
model, that is a userspace ioctl to discard free space in the
filesystem.

hole punching will free the blocks into the free space pool.  If you do
online discard it will also get discarded, but a filesystem that has
online discard enabled doesn't need FITRIM.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html