[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE59E86.1080603@teksavvy.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:45:42 -0500
From: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
CC: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, tytso@....edu,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation
On 10-11-18 02:32 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2010.11.18 at 18:05 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>> Online trim may be slow, but offline would be awfully inconvenient
>> when an fs is big and needed for a live system, or when it's your root fs.
>
> You can call FITRIM from a running system. Infact I run it once per week
> as a cron job on my (mounted) root fs.
Ditto for wiper.sh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists