lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:51:57 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [patch] fs: fix deadlocks in writeback_if_idle

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:03:43 +1100
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > > My original btrfs patch just exported the bdi_ funcs so that btrfs could
> > > > do the above internally.  But Christoph objected, and I think he's
> > > > right.  We should either give everyone a bdi or make sure the writeback
> > > > func kicks only one filesystem.
> > > 
> > > Well it's just kicking the writeback thread, and it will writeback
> > > from that particular sb.
> > 
> > Hmmm?  It will writeback for all the SBs on that bdi.  In the current
> > form that ext4 uses, that gets pretty expensive if you have a bunch of
> > large partitions and you're only running out of space on one of them.
> 
> Right. But if the bdi has writeback in progress (which would be most
> of the time, on a busy filesystem), writeback_if_idle doesn't do
> anything, and it is happy just for the background writeback to
> eventually get around to writing out for us.

That doesn't work if you're running btfs (apparently short for
"busticated filesystem") because the bdi-per-sb thing carefully hid the
information which you're looking for.


We still don't have a fix for this bug yet, it appears, btw.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ