| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTikepNiZsO-8=M5f8JS8dNjyEY1jiSqey=shLVym@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:52:10 -0800 From: Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com> To: linux_ext4@...inbox.com Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: convert from ext3 versus fresh format On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:16 PM, <linux_ext4@...inbox.com> wrote: > I see the procedure on how to convert from ext3 to ext4 on the wiki, and > before I proceed would like to know whether there's an advantage to > formatting as ext4 from the start as opposed to converting after an ext3 > format. We are seeing sizeable improvement on formatting ext4 vs converting from ext2 on magnetic platters. I would expect SSDs would also see an improvement due to extents for ext4 on new files and having no indirect blocks to deal with from ext3. While the cheaper seeks will make some of the improvements less impactful, the fewer accesses should help a lot. Also I don't think an upgrade allows for flex block groups while a format will. This is something you might want to consider also depending on how much you want to tune. > In the case that there is a difference, what exactly is sacrificed in > choosing one over the other? AFAIK the only thing sacrificed in formatting vs upgrade is that you have to preserve your data. If you don't have this concern I would format cleanly. mrubin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists