linux-ext4 - Re: [patch] fs: fix deadlocks in writeback_if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:01:18 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [patch] fs: fix deadlocks in writeback_if_idle

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:26:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 	On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:53:56 +1100
> Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:10:28PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Well, for now, the easiest and simplest fix is my patch, I think. The
> > objection is that we may not write out anything for the specified sb,
> > but the current implementation provides no such guarantees at all
> > anyway, so I don't think it's a big issue.
> 
> Well yes.  We take something which will fail occasionally and with your
> patch replace it with something which will fail a bit more often.  Why
> don't we go all the way and do something which will fail *even more
> often*.  Namely, just delete the damn function in the hope that the
> resulting failures will provoke the ext4 crew into doing something sane
> this time?

I just need it fixed because the deadlocks are constantly hanging my
tests and/or switching off lockdep.

 
> Guys, this delalloc thing *sucks*.  And here we are just sticking new
> bandaids on top of the old bandaids.  And the btrfs approach isn't
> exactly a thing of glory, either.
> 
> So...  nope.  I won't be applying Nick's patch.  Please fix this thing
> properly - you have a whole month!

Testers have less. It would be better to fix it now and rip it out at
the start of the next merge window if you're that way inclined :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html