[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101205100954.GA6564@fritha.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:09:54 +0100
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@...tha.org>
To: Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, htejun@...il.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>
Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt
barrier support is effective)
On 05.12.2010, Matt wrote:
> I should have made it clear that the results I get are observed when
> using the kernels/checkouts *with* the dm-crypt multi-cpu patch,
> without the patch I didn't see that kind of problems (hardlocks, files
> missing, etc.)
I have to take back my other two emails, stating that no corruption
happened with the dm-crypt multi-cpu patch. Today, I encountered
filesystem corruption on one, and a complete hardlock on another machine.
No logfile entries, no m-sysrq, a complete deadlock. Filesystem was
corrupted here too, had to reboot from CD.
The machines with plain 2.6.37-rc4 are up and running...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists