linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext2: speed up file creates by optimizing rec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101207133308.eb2144da.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:33:08 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext2: speed up file creates by optimizing rec_len
 functions

On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:22:55 -0600
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:

> On 12/7/10 3:07 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:51:05 -0600
> > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> The addition of 64k block capability in the rec_len_from_disk
> >> and rec_len_to_disk functions added a bit of math overhead which
> >> slows down file create workloads needlessly when the architecture
> >> cannot even support 64k blocks, thanks to page size limits.
> >>
> >> The directory entry checking can also be optimized a bit
> >> by sprinkling in some unlikely() conditions to move the
> >> error handling out of line.
> >>
> >> bonnie++ sequential file creates on a 512MB ramdisk speeds up
> >> from about 2200/s to about 2500/s, about a 14% improvement.
> >>
> > 
> > hrm, that's an improbably-large sounding improvement from eliminating
> > just a few test-n-branches from a pretty heavyweight operation.
> 
> And yet ...
> 
> Yeah, I dunno.  Part of it is that ext2_add_link does a linear
> search, so when you do rec_len_from_disk 50,000 times on a dir,
> that little bit adds up quite badly I suppose.

oh yeah, that would do it.

> Retesting at a bunch of different number-of-files in bonnie
> (with a small sample size so probably a little noise)
> 
> 	|files per sec|
> files	stock	patched	delta
> 10,000	12300	14700	+19%
> 20,000	 6300	 7600	+20%
> 30,000	 4200	 5000	+20%
> 40,000	 3150	 3700	+17%
> 50,000	 2500	 3000	+20%
> 
> (again all on a 512MB ramdisk)
> 
> *shrug* I'll believe my lyin' eyes, I guess. :)
> 

I bet other tweaks in there would yield similar goodliness.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html