lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTimXznTKJAk7NAQPJC1op8iozsRCT5CHYm72hkkq@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:58:40 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@...efedyk.com> To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, htejun <htejun@...il.com>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective) On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2010-12-09 18:16:16 -0500: >> > 512MB. >> > >> > 'free' reports 75MB, 419MB free. >> > >> > I originally noticed the problem on really real hardware (thinkpad >> > T61p), however. >> >> If you can easily reproduce it could you try a git bisect? > > Do we have a known good kernel? I looked back through the thread and > didn't see any reports where the postgres test on ext4 passed in this > config. > 2.6.34.something. -- Any chance a newer kernel can be tested to be found good? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists