lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20101220154458.GJ23626@thunk.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:44:58 -0500 From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com> Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] mke2fs: simplify inode table block counting On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 08:49:05PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > We have ext2fs_div[64]_ceil() for that. So I can use it like > > ipb = fs->blocksize / EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super); > num = ext2_fs_div_ceil(fs->super->s_inodes_per_group - > ext2fs_bg_itable_unused(fs, i), ipb); > > or > > num = ext2_fs_div_ceil((fs->super->s_inodes_per_group - > ext2fs_bg_itable_unused(fs, i)) * > EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super), > EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE(fs->super)); > > Either is fine to me. Ted, what's your preference? I've checked in the second since it's closer to the original code. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists