[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKy7+cYfPKKywS3FvaJMt2OYApYY8dR81uGHTN@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:25:42 +0100
From: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@...il.com>
To: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Cc: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Atomic file data replace API
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com> wrote:
> I really think that you have missed the point of this list.
>
> This list is for either developers (those who have downloaded the free code
> and work on it) or others who want to move things forward concretely.
Maybe.
> Perfectly fine to contribute ideas, but if you are not a coder or do not
> have the time or inclination to work on things yourself, you have to be
> *really* convincing.
>
> We continually get bombarded with ideas, wish list items, etc so we are not
> lacking in work to do.
I understand.
> If you cannot explain the use case, you will not get any buy in...
I assumed that preserving file owner would be a normal feature and
would not require additional explanation.
One use case would be updating a file in a save way when you have
write access to that file but not to anything else.
Also, according to Ted, a lot of app devs get saving a file in a safe
way wrong. So I'm asking what the recommended way to do it is. Is that
strange?
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists