lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20101229221715.GK10149@thunk.org> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:17:15 -0500 From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Kay Diederichs <kay.diederichs@...-konstanz.de> Cc: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Uneven load on my raid disks. On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 05:40:12PM +0100, Kay Diederichs wrote: > >says: dumpe2fs -h /dev/md0 | grep RAID > > % tune2fs -l /dev/md0 > > ... > RAID stride: 128 > RAID stripe width: 768 > ... > > runs much faster than dumpe2fs. > The command can also adjust the values. Actually, "tune2fs -l" and "dumpe2fs -h" both run in about the same amount of time. dumpe2fs without the -h option runs slower than tune2fs -l, true. But that's because it reads and prints out information regarding the block and inode allocation bitmaps. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists