[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D2206A6.1080505@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:25:58 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>,
ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4: Fix 32bit overflow in ext4_ext_find_goal()
On 01/02/2011 10:11 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:35:39PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> It was written that way because HPC applications writing to a shared
>> file normally write to an offset of task_num * task_data_size so
>> they do not overlap, and end up with a dense file. Similarly,
>> bittorrent and parallel FTP clients will write dense files after
>> seeking randomly around the file, and database files often end up
>> dense as well.
>>
>> I'd rather fix the relatively few applications that expect
>> permanently sparse files to use fadvise() to notify the kernel of
>> this.
>
> Agreed, and I'm not sure there are enough applications that expect
> permanently sparse files that's worth adding a new fadvise(). But if
> we do add a new fadvise(), the default should clearly be the current
> behavior.
>
> If someone knows of use cases where permanently sparse files are
> common, please let us know!
RPM database files stay sparse (Berkeley DB)
$ pwd
/var/lib/rpm
$ ls -lh Basenames; du -h Basenames
-rw-r--r-- 1 rpm rpm 11M Dec 8 12:55 Basenames
9.1M Basenames
etc.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists