[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1294682207-10494-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:56:47 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: hughd@...gle.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix memory leak in ext4_free_branches
Commit 40389687 moved a call to ext4_forget() out of
ext4_free_branches and let ext4_free_blocks() handle calling
bforget(). But that change unfortunately did not replace the call to
ext4_forget() with brelse(), which was needed to drop the in-use count
of the indirect block's buffer head, which lead to a memory leak when
deleting files that used indirect blocks. Fix this.
Thanks to Hugh Dickins for pointing this out.
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 84b6162..e80fc51 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4378,6 +4378,7 @@ static void ext4_free_branches(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
(__le32 *) bh->b_data,
(__le32 *) bh->b_data + addr_per_block,
depth);
+ brelse(bh);
/*
* Everything below this this pointer has been
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists