[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1295625598-15203-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:59:55 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, tytso@....edu, djwong@...ibm.com, shli@...nel.org,
neilb@...e.de, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz,
snitzer@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kmannth@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
rwheeler@...hat.com, hch@....de, josef@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge
Hello,
This patchset reimplements (yeah, once more) so that FLUSH/FUA
requests can be merged. This is inspired by Darrick's patches to
merge multiple zero-data flushes which helps workloads with highly
concurrent fsync requests.
For more information, please read the patch description on the third
patch.
0001-block-add-REQ_FLUSH_SEQ.patch
0002-block-improve-flush-bio-completion.patch
0003-block-reimplement-FLUSH-FUA-to-support-merge.patch
0001-0002 prepare for the reimplementation. 0003 reimplements.
Tested on FLUSH+FUA, FLUSH, and no FLUSH configurations. Works pretty
solid for me. Darrick says that preliminary performance test looks
okay. Darrick, please use this version for further testing as I fixed
a few problems.
This patchset is based on 2.6.38-rc1 (2b1caf6e) and available in the
following git branch,
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git block-flush-merge
and contains the following changes.
block/blk-core.c | 56 ++---
block/blk-flush.c | 441 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
block/blk.h | 12 -
block/elevator.c | 7
include/linux/blk_types.h | 2
include/linux/blkdev.h | 18 +
include/linux/elevator.h | 1
7 files changed, 355 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-)
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists