[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C2FEF4DB-531E-4541-8332-A8845396EAC7@dilger.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:51:36 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: speed up group trim
On 2011-01-24, at 06:39, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>> I don't know either. But that is the user's choice of 'minlen' and we can't
>> provent them from doing like that.
>>
>> Here is a scenario:
>> 1. run with minlen=1mb, he got that only 1G get trimmed. but the free space is
>> more than 3gb actually because of the fragmentation.
>> 2. So he decide to run with minlen=512kb or even smaller len to see whether
>> more space can be trimmed.
>>
>> Is it possible? I guess the answer is yes.
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that this is actually quite useful *feature*. I can imagine that
> people might want to run FITRIM with bigger minlen (megabytes or tens of
> megabytes) weekly, as it is much faster, especially on fragmented
> filesystem. Then, they might want to run FITRIM with smaller minlen (4kB)
> monthly to reclaim even the smaller (or all of them) extents.
>
> But I like Andreas' idea, it should improve FITRIM performance
> significantly (since we are doing mkfs trim). Minlen can be stored in
> high bits of bb_state as number of blocks.
I'd rather just add a proper field in ext4_group_info to store the length. I don't think this will change the actual memory usage, since this is already a fairly large and odd-sized structure.
>>>>> Something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> #define EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_TRIM_BIT 1
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Note that bit clear means a trim is needed, so that a newly mounted
>>>>> * filesystem assumes that holes the group need to be trimmed. */
>>>>> #define EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_TRIM(grp) \
>>>>> (!test_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT,&((grp)->bb_state)))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When calling the TRIM ioctl it can check EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_TRIM(grp) and
>>>>> skip that group if it hasn't changed since last time. Otherwise, it
>>>>> should call EXT4_MB_GRP_DONE_TRIM(grp) before doing the actual trim, so
>>>>> it is not racy with another process freeing blocks in that group.
>>>>>
>>>>> In release_blocks_on_commit() it should call EXT4_MB_GRP_MUST_TRIM() to
>>>>> mark that the group needs to be trimmed again, since blocks were freed
>>>>> in the group.
>>>>>
>>>>> This can potentially avoid a huge number of TRIMs to the disk, if this
>>>>> is run periodically (e.g. every day) and the filesystem is not remounted
>>>>> all the time, and does not undergo huge allocate/free/allocate cycles
>>>>> during daily use.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would even be possible to store this bit on-disk
>>>>> ext4_group_desc->bg_flags to avoid the initial "assume every group needs
>>>>> to be trimmed" operation, if that ends up to be a significant factor.
>>>>> However, that can be done later once some numbers are measured on how
>>>>> significant the initial-mount overhead is. It is also not free, since
>>>>> it will cause disk IO to set/clear this bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>
> --
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists