[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110125204606.GE10664@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:46:06 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, tytso@....edu,
djwong@...ibm.com, shli@...nel.org, neilb@...e.de,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kmannth@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com, hch@....de,
josef@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:31:33AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:49:55PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > + * If the device doesn't have writeback cache, FLUSH and FUA don't make any
> > > + * difference. The requests are either completed immediately if there's no
> > > + * data or executed as normal requests otherwise.
> >
> > For devices without a writeback cache, I'm not seeing where pure flushes
> > are completed immediately. But I do see where data is processed
> > directly in blk_insert_flush().
>
> Yeah, it does. Pure flushes on a device w/o writeback cache, @policy
> is zero and blk_flush_complete_seq() will directly proceed to
> REQ_FSEQ_DONE.
I see following code in __generic_make_request(). I am wondering if empty
flushes will be completed here itself if device does not have writeback
cache.
/*
* Filter flush bio's early so that make_request based
* drivers without flush support don't have to worry
* about them.
*/
if ((bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) && !q->flush_flags) {
bio->bi_rw &= ~(REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA);
if (!nr_sectors) {
err = 0;
goto end_io;
}
}
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists