[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203133820.GF2570@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:38:20 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, "tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"djwong@...ibm.com" <djwong@...ibm.com>,
"shli@...nel.org" <shli@...nel.org>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"adilger.kernel@...ger.ca" <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kmannth@...ibm.com" <kmannth@...ibm.com>,
"cmm@...ibm.com" <cmm@...ibm.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"rwheeler@...hat.com" <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "josef@...hat.com" <josef@...hat.com>,
"jmoyer@...hat.com" <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data initialization for
flush requests
Hey, Jens.
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 02:24:42PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-02-02 23:55, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > REQ_SORTED is not set for flush requests because they are never put on
> > the IO scheduler.
>
> That looks very wrong. REQ_SORTED gets set _when_ the request is sorted
> into the IO scheduler. This is gross misuse, a bad hack.
The rationale behind suggesting was that it indicates to the allocator
that the request may be sorted as how the request will be used is
communicated using @rw_flags to the allocator. The patch is buggy
that the flag actually ends up on the request. Any better idea how to
communicate it?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists