[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110204155358.GF4104@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:53:58 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] jbd2 : Make jbd2 transaction handle allocation to
return errors and handle them gracefully.
On Sat 29-01-11 21:40:03, Manish Katiyar wrote:
Hi Manish,
> Have we reached on any conclusion yet on the function name which I can
> use to send my updated patch ? My preference from the above list is to
> use ext4_journal_start_nofs() as that seems the closest match, but I
> would like hear the conclusion from experts.
How about "ext4_journal_start_tryhard()"? I don't like "nofs" because
the fact whether we use GFP_NOFS is separate from the fact whether we are
able to handle memory allocation failure.
In fact, your patch set should keep calling kzalloc() with GFP_NOFS in all
cases to avoid new recursions into the filesystem (which could cause
deadlocks - changing that would need a separate audit if we care enough).
Just the retrying logic should be influenced by your work.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists