[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102091445580.5596@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:01:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: Speed up FITRIM by recording flags in
ext4_group_info.
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Tao Ma wrote:
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>
> In ext4, when FITRIM is called every time, we iterate all the
> groups and do trim one by one. It is a bit time wasting if the
> group has been trimmed and there is no change since the last
> trim.
>
> So this patch adds a new flag in ext4_group_info->bb_state to
> indicate that the group has been trimmed, and it will be cleared
> if some blocks is freed(in release_blocks_on_commit). Another
> trim_minlen is added in ext4_sb_info to record the last minlen
> we use to trim the volume, so that if the caller provide a small
> one, we will go on the trim regardless of the bb_state. The idea
> is inspired by Andreas and Lukas Czerner.
Hi Tao,
This is great, thanks for the patch! Do you have any benchmark numbers
showing how much does it improve FSTRIM time ? It seems it might help a
lot. Couple of comments bellow.
>
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
> Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 8 +++++++-
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 0c8d97b..684f48e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1200,6 +1200,9 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
> struct ext4_li_request *s_li_request;
> /* Wait multiplier for lazy initialization thread */
> unsigned int s_li_wait_mult;
> +
> + /* record the last minlen when FITRIM is called. */
> + u64 trim_minlen;
Maybe this is a bit nitpicking, but it is not very clear what is the
"trim_minlen" for. I would rather use something like
"last_trim_minblks", or similar.
> };
>
> static inline struct ext4_sb_info *EXT4_SB(struct super_block *sb)
> @@ -1970,10 +1973,13 @@ struct ext4_group_info {
> * 5 free 8-block regions. */
> };
>
> -#define EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT 0
> +#define EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT 0
> +#define EXT4_GROUP_INFO_HAS_BEEN_TRIMMED 1
>
> #define EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(grp) \
> (test_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT, &((grp)->bb_state)))
> +#define EXT4_MB_GRP_HAS_BEEN_TRIMMED(grp) \
> + (test_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_HAS_BEEN_TRIMMED, &((grp)->bb_state)))
>
> #define EXT4_MAX_CONTENTION 8
> #define EXT4_CONTENTION_THRESHOLD 2
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 4eadac8..3f6b809 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -1563,6 +1563,9 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
> mb_set_bits(EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b), ex->fe_start, len0);
> mb_check_buddy(e4b);
>
> + if (!ret)
> + EXT4_SB(sb)->trim_minlen = minlen;
> +
Did you even tried to compile it ? "minlen" is not defined in
mb_mark_used(), also it does make sense to set trim_minlen there. Did
not you meant it to be in ext4_trim_fs ?
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2687,6 +2690,16 @@ static void release_blocks_on_commit(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *txn)
> rb_erase(&entry->node, &(db->bb_free_root));
> mb_free_blocks(NULL, &e4b, entry->start_blk, entry->count);
>
> + /*
> + * Clear the trimmed flag for the group so that the next
> + * ext4_trim_fs can trim it.
> + * If the volume is mounted with -o discard, online discard
> + * is supported and the free blocks will be trimmed online.
> + */
> + if (!test_opt(sb, DISCARD))
> + clear_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_HAS_BEEN_TRIMMED,
> + &(db->bb_state));
> +
> if (!db->bb_free_root.rb_node) {
> /* No more items in the per group rb tree
> * balance refcounts from ext4_mb_free_metadata()
> @@ -4772,6 +4785,10 @@ ext4_grpblk_t ext4_trim_all_free(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
>
> ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
>
> + if (EXT4_MB_GRP_HAS_BEEN_TRIMMED(e4b->bd_info) &&
> + minblocks >= EXT4_SB(sb)->trim_minlen)
> + goto out;
> +
I think this can be placed in the ext4_trim_fs() in the for() loop so we can
avoid unnecessary call to ext4_trim_all_free.
> trace_ext4_trim_all_free(sb, group, start, max);
>
> while (start < max) {
> @@ -4804,6 +4821,11 @@ ext4_grpblk_t ext4_trim_all_free(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
> if ((e4b->bd_info->bb_free - free_count) < minblocks)
> break;
> }
> +
> + if (!ret)
> + set_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_HAS_BEEN_TRIMMED,
> + &(e4b->bd_info->bb_state));
> +out:
> ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
>
> ext4_debug("trimmed %d blocks in the group %d\n",
>
Thanks!
-Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists