[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTineDxntR0ZTXdgXrc6qx6pATTORgOwFR5+w5MLN@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:33:59 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL]
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> Please pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git for_linus
>
> to get regression and bug fixes for 2.6.38.
>
> Eric Sandeen (3):
> ext4: serialize unaligned asynchronous DIO
This is a completely disgusting patch, and it causes warnings like this:
fs/ext4/file.c: In function ‘ext4_aiodio_wait’:
fs/ext4/file.c:60:44: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
because that disgusting patch does things like
#define ext4_aio_mutex(v) (&ext4__aio_mutex[((unsigned)v) % EXT4_WQ_HASH_SZ])
which is just terminally broken.
It's terminally broken for multiple reasons, too. It's not just "oh, a
warning". It's a case of "oh, THAT CODE IS UTTER CRAP". The warning
was just the lucky reason I noticed the totally unacceptable code.
Dammit, don't send sh*t to me this late in the release cycle. This
clearly went through _zero_ quality control.
Linus
PS. If people don't understand why that code is utter crap, let me
give you a hint: macro argument expansion vs operator precedence.
PPS. And btw, the warning is unacceptable too. Cast the thing to
"unsigned long" (or uintptr_t, but quite frankly, in the kernel I'd
suggest "unsigned long" rather than the more obscure standard types)
after you've fixed the macro argument problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists