[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimx5OPukk9SYDySjCNEAwPgHY3J6OX-FeYaAv0Y@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:27:24 -0800
From: Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: reserve inodes and feature code for 'quota' feature
The code 0x0080 seems to be reserved for
EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_HAS_SNAPSHOT in e2fsprogs/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
for Next3 snapshot feature.
Thanks,
--
Aditya
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Tao Ma <tm@....ma> wrote:
> Hi Aditya,
> On 02/15/2011 09:06 AM, Aditya Kali wrote:
>>
>> I am working on patch to add quota as a built-in feature for ext4
>> filesystem. The implementation is based on the design given at
>> https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Design_For_1st_Class_Quota_in_Ext4.
>> This patch reserves the inode numbers 3 and 4 for quota purposes and
>> also reserves EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA feature code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali<adityakali@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 +++
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> index 0c8d97b..127f76f 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> @@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ struct ext4_io_submit {
>> */
>> #define EXT4_BAD_INO 1 /* Bad blocks inode */
>> #define EXT4_ROOT_INO 2 /* Root inode */
>> +#define EXT4_USR_QUOTA_INO 3 /* User quota inode */
>> +#define EXT4_GRP_QUOTA_INO 4 /* Group quota inode */
>> #define EXT4_BOOT_LOADER_INO 5 /* Boot loader inode */
>> #define EXT4_UNDEL_DIR_INO 6 /* Undelete directory inode */
>> #define EXT4_RESIZE_INO 7 /* Reserved group
>> descriptors inode */
>> @@ -1337,6 +1339,7 @@ static inline void ext4_clear_state_flags(struct
>> ext4_inode_info *ei)
>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM 0x0010
>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK 0x0020
>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE 0x0040
>> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA 0x0100
>>
>
> I am just wondering why 0x0080 is skipped here? It is reserved already?
>>
>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESSION 0x0001
>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE 0x0002
>>
>
> Regards,
> Tao
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists