[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik1wVdfjd4PH8rf3rKnunGtXfSPiJ_qzu0-HR5J@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:12:21 +0200
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] e2fsprogs: turn off enforced fsck intervals by default
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> The forced fsck often comes at unexpected and inopportune moments,
>> and even enterprise customers are often caught by surprise when
>> this happens. Because a filesystem with an error condition will
>> be marked as requiring fsck anyway, I submit that the time-based
>> and mount-based checks are not particularly useful, and that
>> administrators can schedule fscks on their own time, or tune2fs
>> the enforced intervals if they so choose. Patch #1 disables the
>> intervals by default, and I've added a new mkfs option (-C) to
>> turn on the old behavior of random, unexpected, time-consuming
>> fscks at boot time. ;)
>
> I completely agree with you and I like the idea.
I second that, though I would change the mkfs option to -OCD ;-)
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h b/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h
>> index a204eb7..37584aa 100644
>> --- a/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h
>> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h
>> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ typedef struct ext2_file *ext2_file_t;
>> #define EXT2_FLAG_64BITS 0x20000
>> #define EXT2_FLAG_PRINT_PROGRESS 0x40000
>> #define EXT2_FLAG_DIRECT_IO 0x80000
>> +#define EXT2_FLAG_MOUNT_FSCK_CHECK 0x100000
>>
>> /*
>> * Special flag in the ext2 inode i_flag field that means that this is
>> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/initialize.c b/lib/ext2fs/initialize.c
>> index 7c38975..ff63a92 100644
>> --- a/lib/ext2fs/initialize.c
>> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/initialize.c
>> @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_initialize(const char *name, int flags,
>> set_field(s_log_block_size, 0); /* default blocksize: 1024 bytes */
>> set_field(s_log_frag_size, 0); /* default fragsize: 1024 bytes */
>> set_field(s_first_data_block, super->s_log_block_size ? 0 : 1);
>> - set_field(s_max_mnt_count, EXT2_DFL_MAX_MNT_COUNT);
>> set_field(s_errors, EXT2_ERRORS_DEFAULT);
>> set_field(s_feature_compat, 0);
>> set_field(s_feature_incompat, 0);
>> @@ -189,7 +188,10 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_initialize(const char *name, int flags,
>> super->s_inode_size = EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
>> }
>>
>> - set_field(s_checkinterval, EXT2_DFL_CHECKINTERVAL);
>> + if (flags & EXT2_FLAG_MOUNT_FSCK_CHECK) {
>> + set_field(s_max_mnt_count, EXT2_DFL_MAX_MNT_COUNT);
>> + set_field(s_checkinterval, EXT2_DFL_CHECKINTERVAL);
>> + }
>> super->s_mkfs_time = super->s_lastcheck = fs->now ? fs->now : time(NULL);
>>
>> super->s_creator_os = CREATOR_OS;
>> diff --git a/misc/mke2fs.8.in b/misc/mke2fs.8.in
>> index 2eead17..758307f 100644
>> --- a/misc/mke2fs.8.in
>> +++ b/misc/mke2fs.8.in
>> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ mke2fs \- create an ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystem
>> .I block-size
>> ]
>> [
>> +.B \-C
>> +]
>> +[
>> .B \-f
>> .I fragment-size
>> ]
>> @@ -184,6 +187,10 @@ Check the device for bad blocks before creating the file system. If
>> this option is specified twice, then a slower read-write
>> test is used instead of a fast read-only test.
>> .TP
>> +.B \-C
>> +Set maximum mount count and interval between checks, so that a full fsck
>> +will be enforced when these counts are exceeded.
>> +.TP
>> .BI \-E " extended-options"
>> Set extended options for the filesystem. Extended options are comma
>> separated, and may take an argument using the equals ('=') sign. The
>> diff --git a/misc/mke2fs.c b/misc/mke2fs.c
>> index 0ba4a4c..fdeafe3 100644
>> --- a/misc/mke2fs.c
>> +++ b/misc/mke2fs.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ const char * device_name /* = NULL */;
>>
>> /* Command line options */
>> int cflag;
>> +int Cflag;
>
> Uff, this is not really an issue, however would it be possible to have
> better name for Cflags :) ? it is just confusing.
>
>> int verbose;
>> int quiet;
>> int super_only;
>> @@ -1228,7 +1229,7 @@ profile_error:
>> }
>>
>> while ((c = getopt (argc, argv,
>> - "b:cf:g:G:i:jl:m:no:qr:s:t:vE:FI:J:KL:M:N:O:R:ST:U:V")) != EOF) {
>> + "b:cf:g:G:i:jl:m:no:qr:s:t:vCE:FI:J:KL:M:N:O:R:ST:U:V")) != EOF) {
>> switch (c) {
>> case 'b':
>> blocksize = strtol(optarg, &tmp, 0);
>> @@ -1251,6 +1252,9 @@ profile_error:
>> case 'c': /* Check for bad blocks */
>> cflag++;
>> break;
>> + case 'C': /* Set default check/fsck intervals */
>> + Cflag++;
>> + break;
>> case 'f':
>> size = strtoul(optarg, &tmp, 0);
>> if (size < EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE ||
>> @@ -2030,6 +2034,8 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
>> */
>> if (!quiet)
>> flags |= EXT2_FLAG_PRINT_PROGRESS;
>> + if (Cflag)
>> + flags |= EXT2_FLAG_MOUNT_FSCK_CHECK;
>> retval = ext2fs_initialize(device_name, flags, &fs_param, io_ptr, &fs);
>> if (retval) {
>> com_err(device_name, retval, _("while setting up superblock"));
>> @@ -2109,9 +2115,11 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
>> * don't check all the filesystems at the same time. We use a
>> * kludgy hack of using the UUID to derive a random jitter value.
>> */
>> - for (i = 0, val = 0 ; i < sizeof(fs->super->s_uuid); i++)
>> - val += fs->super->s_uuid[i];
>> - fs->super->s_max_mnt_count += val % EXT2_DFL_MAX_MNT_COUNT;
>> + if (Cflag) {
>> + for (i = 0, val = 0 ; i < sizeof(fs->super->s_uuid); i++)
>> + val += fs->super->s_uuid[i];
>> + fs->super->s_max_mnt_count += val % EXT2_DFL_MAX_MNT_COUNT;
>> + }
>>
>> /*
>> * Override the creator OS, if applicable
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists