[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D5C473D.5030009@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:53:01 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] e2fsprogs: enable user namespace xattrs by default
On 2/16/11 3:49 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:27:39PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 2/16/11 1:15 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>> On 2011-02-16, at 11:21, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> User namespace xattrs are generally useful, and I think extN
>>>> is the only filesystem requiring a special mount option to
>>>> enable them, when xattrs are otherwise available. So this
>>>> change sets that mount option into the defaults.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be more useful to change this in the kernel, instead of only changing it in the superblock for new filesystems?
>>>
>>
>> I thought about that; maybe it should happen in both places?
>
> Yes, agreed. Maybe we should do the same thing with posix ACL's as
> well? ACL's can only take away access as compared to the unix
> permission bits, so it's safe to enable ACL's.
>
> - Ted
>
Whoops, I didn't realize that acls were in the same boat, of "config on and then turn on with a mount option"
Ok, sure, adding that makes sense to me too...
Is sticking it in the _initialize() function ok with you? It's a little odd, but ...
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists