[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110222135431.GK21917@bitwizard.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:54:31 +0100
From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
To: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Pawe?? Brodacki <pawel.brodacki@...glemail.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck performance.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:36:52PM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:20:56AM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > I wouldn't be surprised if I'd need more than 3G of RAM. When I
> > extrapolated "more than a few days" it was at under 20% of the
> > filesystem and had already allocated on the order of 800Gb of
> > memory. Now I'm not entirely sure that this is fair: memory use seems
> > to go up quickly in the beginning, and then stabilize: as if it has
> > decided that 800M of memory use is "acceptable" and somehow uses a
> > different strategy once it hits that limit.
>
> OK. Good news. It's finished pass1. It is currently using about 2100Mb
> of RAM (ehh. mostly swap, I have only 1G in there). Here is the patch.
Forgot the patch.
Roger.
--
** R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
View attachment "cputimefix.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (974 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists