linux-ext4 - [PATCH -V5 05/24] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1298469131-16555-6-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:21:52 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	sfrench@...ibm.com, agruen@...bit.com, dilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	sandeen@...hat.com, tytso@....edu, bfields@...ldses.org,
	jlayton@...hat.com
Cc:	aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH -V5 05/24] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support

From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>

Introduce a new MS_RICHACL super-block flag and a new IS_RICHACL() test
which file systems like nfs can use.  IS_ACL() is true if IS_POSIXACL()
or IS_RICHACL() is true.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/fs.h |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 70c7779..e542157 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
 #define MS_KERNMOUNT	(1<<22) /* this is a kern_mount call */
 #define MS_I_VERSION	(1<<23) /* Update inode I_version field */
 #define MS_STRICTATIME	(1<<24) /* Always perform atime updates */
+#define MS_RICHACL	(1<<25) /* Supports richacls */
 #define MS_BORN		(1<<29)
 #define MS_ACTIVE	(1<<30)
 #define MS_NOUSER	(1<<31)
@@ -272,6 +273,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
 #define IS_APPEND(inode)	((inode)->i_flags & S_APPEND)
 #define IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)	((inode)->i_flags & S_IMMUTABLE)
 #define IS_POSIXACL(inode)	__IS_FLG(inode, MS_POSIXACL)
+#define IS_RICHACL(inode)	__IS_FLG(inode, MS_RICHACL)
 
 #define IS_DEADDIR(inode)	((inode)->i_flags & S_DEAD)
 #define IS_NOCMTIME(inode)	((inode)->i_flags & S_NOCMTIME)
@@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
  * IS_ACL() tells the VFS to not apply the umask
  * and use iop->check_acl for acl permission checks when defined.
  */
-#define IS_ACL(inode)		__IS_FLG(inode, MS_POSIXACL)
+#define IS_ACL(inode)		__IS_FLG(inode, MS_POSIXACL | MS_RICHACL)
 
 /* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is
    probably as bad and I don't want to create yet another include file. */
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html