[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110226162826.GC2924@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:28:26 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] e2image: Add support for qcow2 format
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:49:30PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> This commit adds support for exporting filesystem into QCOW2 image
> format. Like sparse format this saves space, by writing only necessary
> (metadata blocks) into image. Unlike sparse image, QCOW2 image is NOT
> sparse, hence does not change its size by copying with not-sparse-aware
> tools.
>
> New options '-Q' has been added to tell the e2image to use QCOW2 as an
> output image format. QCOW2 supports encryption and compression, however
> e2image so far does no support such features, however you can still
> scramble filenames with '-s' option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
I noticed that the qcow2 functions have a qcow2_ prefix and aren't
prefixed with ext2_. That's a namespace leakage, although I
understand why adding ext2_ to functions that really have nothing to
do with ext2_ might not make sense.
What this *does* make me wonder though, is whether or not we should
split off qcow2 into its own separate library...
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists