linux-ext4 - Re: Proposed design for big allocation blocks for ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:33:20 -0800
From:	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proposed design for big allocation blocks for ext4

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:31:40PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:03:04PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> > > We could add complexity to do suballocations for directories, but KISS
> > > seems to be a much better idea for now.
> > 
> > 	Oh dear God no.
> 
> What are you saying no to?  KISS or suballocations?  :-)

	You know the answer to that ;-)  Though if you ever do smoke
some crack and design suballocations, ocfs2 will happily steal them.

Jool

-- 

"Only a life lived for others is a life worth while."
							-Albert Einstein  

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@...lplan.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html