lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110227215947.GI2924@thunk.org>
Date:	Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:59:47 -0500
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add basic BIGALLOC support for cluster-based allocation

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:20:55AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Just to be clear, my alternative suggestion to on-disk format change was:
> 
>         __u32   s_log_block_size;       /* Block size */
> -       __s32   s_log_frag_size;        /* Fragment size */
> +       __s32   s_log_cluster_size;     /* Allocation cluster size */
> -       __u32   s_blocks_per_group;     /* # Blocks per group */
> +       __u32   s_clusters_per_group;   /* # Clusters per group */
> -       __u32   s_frags_per_group;      /* # Fragments per group */
> +       __u32   s_blocks_per_group;   /* # Blocks per group */
>         __u32   s_inodes_per_group;     /* # Inodes per group */
> 
> This way, old kernels see a sane value in what used to be
> s_blocks_per_group (32K) and new kernels (even without the BIGALLOC
> feature) make sure to write correct values in both new
> s_blocks_per_group and s_clusters_per_group (old s_blocks_per_group)

Unfortunately, that's likely to confuse old kernels even more, since
s_blocks_per_group is used to calculate the number of block groups,
i.e. s_blocks_count / s_blocks_per_group.  In BIGALLOC mode, the
number of block groups go down, and so if we change s_blocks_per_group
to s_clusters_per_group, it's likely to cause much mischief, for
example in ext4_check_descriptors().

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ