linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Fix a BUG in mb_mark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:38:56 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Fix a BUG in mb_mark_used during trim.

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:33:35PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> Actually these numbers are related to the block size of a ext4 volume.
> To be more specific, with the above number, we have
> first_block + block_len > EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP while
> block_len < EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP.
> So do you think it is generic enough for a test case in xfstests
> since now this
> tool kit is also used to test xfs and btrfs?

xfstests also allows filesystem-specific tests.  Most of the specific
tests are for xfs, but there are few for udf right now as well.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html