[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110310071119.GF31710@bitwizard.nl>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:11:19 +0100
From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Time for "mkdir" on ext3.
Hi,
I have an ext3 filesystem. When I "cp -lr" a big tree there, it turns
out that the "mkdir" calls take the bulk of the time. IIRC there are
325000 directories (and 4 million files). Each mkdir call takes about
50ms (*), so that accounts for about 4.5 hours of the running time.
Would ext4 perform significantly better?
Roger.
(*) I forgot about this Email while it was still in my editor. Now a
day layter the mkdir calls all take around 17ms, and things run about
3x faster. On the other hand it's been running for over 5 hours. And
yesterday I've seen a streak of >100ms mkdir calls... So apparently
it depends on "something"....
--
** R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists