linux-ext4 - Re: Large directories and poor order correlation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D7F7953.9080705@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:36:03 -0400
From:	Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@...il.com>
To:	Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
CC:	Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Large directories and poor order correlation

On 03/15/2011 10:33 AM, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:01:24AM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> To try and clarify this point a bit, are you saying that applications
>> like tar and rsync should be patched to sort the directory by inode
>> number, rather than it being the job of the fs to return entries in a
>> good order?
> IMHO, it is the job of the FS to perform well in common cases.
>
> 	Roger.
>

Some file systems do this well. The thread here is more focused on dealing with 
issues for file systems that handle this poorly :)

Ric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html