| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:28:35 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH, RFC 10/12] ext4: teach ext4_statfs() to deal with clusters if bigalloc is enabled
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index f9b25cd..24964da 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4438,15 +4438,33 @@ restore_opts:
return err;
}
+/*
+ * Note: calculating the overhead so we can be compatible with
+ * historical BSD practice is quite difficult in the face of
+ * clusters/bigalloc. This is because multiple metadata blocks from
+ * different block group can end up in the same allocation cluster.
+ * Calculating the exact overhead in the face of clustered allocation
+ * requires either O(all block bitmaps) in memory or O(number of block
+ * groups**2) in time. We will still calculate the superblock for
+ * older file systems --- and if we come across with a bigalloc file
+ * system with zero in s_overhead_blocks the estimate will be close to
+ * correct especially for very large cluster sizes --- but for newer
+ * file systems, it's better to calculate this figure once at mkfs
+ * time, and store it in the superblock. If the superblock value is
+ * present (even for non-bigalloc file systems), we will use it.
+ */
static int ext4_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
{
struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
+ struct ext4_group_desc *gdp;
u64 fsid;
if (test_opt(sb, MINIX_DF)) {
sbi->s_overhead_last = 0;
+ } else if (es->s_overhead_blocks) {
+ sbi->s_overhead_last = le32_to_cpu(es->s_overhead_blocks);
} else if (sbi->s_blocks_last != ext4_blocks_count(es)) {
ext4_group_t i, ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
ext4_fsblk_t overhead = 0;
@@ -4461,24 +4479,16 @@ static int ext4_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
* All of the blocks before first_data_block are
* overhead
*/
- overhead = le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);
+ overhead = EXT4_B2C(sbi, le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block));
/*
- * Add the overhead attributed to the superblock and
- * block group descriptors. If the sparse superblocks
- * feature is turned on, then not all groups have this.
+ * Add the overhead found in each block group
*/
for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
- overhead += ext4_bg_has_super(sb, i) +
- ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, i);
+ gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, i, NULL);
+ overhead += ext4_num_overhead_clusters(sb, i, gdp);
cond_resched();
}
-
- /*
- * Every block group has an inode bitmap, a block
- * bitmap, and an inode table.
- */
- overhead += ngroups * (2 + sbi->s_itb_per_group);
sbi->s_overhead_last = overhead;
smp_wmb();
sbi->s_blocks_last = ext4_blocks_count(es);
@@ -4489,6 +4499,7 @@ static int ext4_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
buf->f_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(es) - sbi->s_overhead_last;
buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter) -
percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter);
+ buf->f_bfree = buf->f_bfree << sbi->s_cluster_bits;
buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree - ext4_r_blocks_count(es);
if (buf->f_bfree < ext4_r_blocks_count(es))
buf->f_bavail = 0;
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists