linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH, RFC 10/12] ext4: teach ext4_statfs() to deal with clusters if bigalloc is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110322220921.GD3907@thunk.org>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:09:21 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 10/12] ext4: teach ext4_statfs() to deal with
 clusters if bigalloc is enabled

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:17:30PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> 
> overhead is in clusters units, but
> 
> >  		smp_wmb();
> >  		sbi->s_blocks_last = ext4_blocks_count(es);
> > @@ -4489,6 +4499,7 @@ static int ext4_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
> >  	buf->f_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(es) - sbi->s_overhead_last;
> 
> here it seems to be treated as blocks if I am not missing something.

Oops, good point!  Thanks for catching that.

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html