[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D90A42A.3070401@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:07:22 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brandt <brandtc@...5.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck.ext4 taking months
On 3/27/11 6:28 AM, Christian Brandt wrote:
> Situation: External 500GB drive holds lots of snapshots using lots of
> hard links made by rsync --link-dest. The controller went bad and
> destroyed superblock and directory structures. The drive contains
> roughly a million files and four complete directory-tree-snapshots with
> each roughly a million hardlinks.
>
> Tried
>
> e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> Benutze EXT2FS Library version 1.41.12, 17-May-2010
>
> e2fsck 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
> Benutze EXT2FS Library version 1.41.11, 14-Mar-2010
>
> Symptoms: fsck.ext4 -y -f takes nearly a month to fix the structures on
> a P4@2,8Ghz, with very little access to the drive and 100% cpu use.
Does that mean very little access to -this- drive or to -any- drive?
IOW, are you swapping madly?
-Eric
> output of fsck looks much like this:
>
> File ??? (Inode #123456, modify time Wed Jul 22 16:20:23 2009)
> block Nr. 6144 double block(s), used with four file(s):
> <filesystem metadata>
> ??? (Inode #123457, mod time Wed Jul 22 16:20:23 2009)
> ??? (Inode #123458, mod time Wed Jul 22 16:20:23 2009)
> ...
> multiply claimed block map? Yes
>
> Is there an adhoc method of getting my data back faster?
>
> Is the slow performance with lots of hard links a known issue?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists