lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D923F55.1010507@psi5.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:21:41 +0200
From:	Christian Brandt <brandtc@...5.com>
To:	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck.ext4 taking months

Am 28.03.2011 16:43, schrieb Ric Wheeler:

> Sounds like a configuration that might well require lots of memory to
> cache your allocated inodes, etc. How much memory do you have in the
> box running fsck? Any sense (vmstat, etc) what the box is spending
> its time doing?

 100% CPU use as seen in top and ps.

 The first System had 1GB and the process used 680MB, a plain Ubuntu
with nothing else running.

 I tried another system with 4GB, at least 3GB free, the process still
uses only 680MB. Booted from a Knoppix-CD, nothing running except fsck,
vmstat says:

procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system--
----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy
id wa
 1  0      0 1573456 797988 776484    0    0    13     8    7   18 41  5
53  2

-- 
Christian Brandt

 life is short and in most cases it ends with death
 but my tombstone will carry the hiscore
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ