[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik9irNe5QnNdKAsU88KyJ1bNHTNZBV4iYdzxUun@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:01:01 +0200
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: XFS <xfs@....sgi.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 3/23/11 10:33 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/23/11 9:36 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been running xfstests on ext4 and I always get annoying failures to umount:
>>>>>
>>>>> 213 8s ... 31s
>>>>> umount: /mnt/test/ext4: device is busy.
>>>>> (In some cases useful info about processes that use
>>>>> the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
>>>>>
>>>>> post 198 mostly fails to umount as well.
>>>>> and post 124 always fails to umount.
USE_REMOUNT=1 fixes (bypasses) the problem for non scratch tests, so
I'm good with it for now :-)
Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists