[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1303408265-sup-2454@think>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:00:29 -0400
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, xfs <xfs@....sgi.com>,
jack <jack@...e.cz>, axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
dchinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: buffered writeback torture program
Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-04-21 13:41:21 -0400:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:34:44PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Sorry, this doesn't do it. I think that given what a strange special
> > case this is, we're best off waiting for the IO-less throttling, and
> > maybe changing the code in xfs/ext4 to be a little more seek aware. Or
> > maybe not, it has to get written eventually either way.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean with seek aware. XFS only clusters
> additional pages that are in the same extent, and in fact only does
> so for asynchrononous writeback. Not sure how this should be more
> seek aware.
>
How big are extents? fiemap tells me the file has a single 8GB extent.
There's a little room for seeking inside there.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists