[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1303410534-sup-6933@think>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:29:37 -0400
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, xfs <xfs@....sgi.com>,
jack <jack@...e.cz>, axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
dchinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: buffered writeback torture program
Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-04-21 14:08:05 -0400:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > For this program, they are almost all dirty pages.
> >
> > I tried patching it to give up if we seek but it is still pretty slow.
> > There's something else going on in addition to the xfs clustering being
> > too aggressive.
>
> I'm not sure where you this beeing to agressive from - it's doing
> exactly the same amount of I/O as a filesystem writing out a single
> page from ->writepage or using write_cache_pages (either directly
> or as a copy) as ->writepages. The only thing special compared to
> the no ->writepages case is that it's submitting a large I/O
> from the first ->writepage call.
>
Ok, I see what you mean. The clustering code stops once it hits
nr_to_write, I missed that. So we shouldn't be doing more than a single
writepages call.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists