lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:40:01 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <>
To:	Curt Wohlgemuth <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: Don't set PageUptodate in ext4_end_bio()

On 2011-04-25, at 2:23 PM, Curt Wohlgemuth wrote:
> In the bio completion routine, we should not be setting
> PageUptodate at all -- it's set at sys_write() time, and is
> unaffected by success/failure of the write to disk.
> This can cause a page corruption bug when
>    block size < page size
> @@ -203,46 +203,29 @@ static void ext4_end_bio(struct bio *bio, int error)
> -		/*
> -		 * If this is a partial write which happened to make
> -		 * all buffers uptodate then we can optimize away a
> -		 * bogus readpage() for the next read(). Here we
> -		 * 'discover' whether the page went uptodate as a
> -		 * result of this (potentially partial) write.
> -		 */
> -		if (!partial_write)
> -			SetPageUptodate(page);
> -

I think this is the important part of the code - if there is a read-after-write for a file that was written in "blocksize" units (blocksize < pagesize), does the page get set uptodate when all of the blocks have been written and/or the writing is at EOF?  Otherwise, a read-after-write will always cause data to be fetched from disk needlessly, even though the uptodate information is already in cache.

Cheers, Andreas

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists