[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4194C4D6-BE86-42CA-BBB4-A8A0E7E94EAC@dilger.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:40:01 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jim@...ering.net, cmm@...ibm.com,
hughd@...gle.com, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: Don't set PageUptodate in ext4_end_bio()
On 2011-04-25, at 2:23 PM, Curt Wohlgemuth wrote:
> In the bio completion routine, we should not be setting
> PageUptodate at all -- it's set at sys_write() time, and is
> unaffected by success/failure of the write to disk.
>
> This can cause a page corruption bug when
>
> block size < page size
>
> @@ -203,46 +203,29 @@ static void ext4_end_bio(struct bio *bio, int error)
> - /*
> - * If this is a partial write which happened to make
> - * all buffers uptodate then we can optimize away a
> - * bogus readpage() for the next read(). Here we
> - * 'discover' whether the page went uptodate as a
> - * result of this (potentially partial) write.
> - */
> - if (!partial_write)
> - SetPageUptodate(page);
> -
I think this is the important part of the code - if there is a read-after-write for a file that was written in "blocksize" units (blocksize < pagesize), does the page get set uptodate when all of the blocks have been written and/or the writing is at EOF? Otherwise, a read-after-write will always cause data to be fetched from disk needlessly, even though the uptodate information is already in cache.
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists