lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:56:58 +0800
From:	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
To:	Niraj Kulkarni <kulkarniniraj14@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Need of revoke mechanism in JBD

AFAIK, it can accelerate the recovering process.  If a block is in the
revoke table of a transaction t1 and t1 is committed, then the there
is no need to recover the block in transactions which is earlier than
t1.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Niraj Kulkarni
<kulkarniniraj14@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>      I am new to fs development. I am trying to modify the journal structure
> of JBD. While analyzing the code, I could understand most of the things, but
> I am not able to understand the need of revoke mechanism. Can anybody
> enlighten me on this issue?
>
> Regards
> Niraj
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Best Wishes
Yongqiang Yang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists